Use it internally.
Hand the recommendations to your existing billing or revenue-cycle team and work them yourselves.
Soft Appeals begins with a complimentary review of 20 recent denied claims, so you can see what needs action before deciding whether to engage anyone for recovery work. Your assessment organizes the reviewed claims by recommended action, financial value, priority, known time sensitivity and additional information required. You keep it whether or not you continue.
Do not include patient names, dates of birth, medical record numbers, claim attachments, clinical records or other protected health information in the form below.
Patient-level information is requested only after the appropriate privacy documentation and secure intake process have been established. The form asks about your organization and your denial situation, nothing more.
Complete the short form below using general business and denial information. No patient records are needed at this stage.
We read what you sent to decide whether the claims and the scope you are describing suit the service. If more information is needed, we ask a business-level question rather than requesting records.
Where the review will involve protected health information, the applicable Business Associate Agreement and the secure information-sharing process are established before PHI is exchanged.
Once the intake process is ready, your organization receives instructions for providing the agreed claim and denial information through the designated channel.
Soft Appeals reviews the selected claims and returns a structured assessment showing recommended actions, financial value, priority, known time-sensitive items and information still required. Then you decide what happens next.
Business-level information only. Every question below is answerable without opening a chart. If you are not sure of a number, an estimate is fine, and "not sure" is a real answer on most of these.
You may already have denial letters, explanations of benefits, remittance files, spreadsheets, screenshots or patient records ready to go. Keep them inside your existing approved environment until the Soft Appeals intake process is established. Once it is, you will be told exactly what is needed and how to provide it.
Once the agreements and the secure intake process are in place, the information needed for the 20-denial review may include the following. If something is missing, Soft Appeals identifies what it is and why it is needed rather than asking for a folder.
Enough to understand what was billed, what was denied and the payer's stated reason.
The relevant denial codes, explanations, correspondence or payment information.
Acknowledgement, filing or other claim-submission evidence where it is relevant.
Only the documentation reasonably needed to understand or evaluate the selected claim.
By default, the complimentary review does not require:
Start with the agreed 20 claims. Expand when there is a reason to.
Correct and resubmit, appeal, investigate, or close and deprioritize.
The denied amount associated with the reviewed claim.
Which claims warrant earlier attention, based on the information available.
Known time-sensitive items, and the deadlines that need confirming.
Why the claim received the next action it did.
What is missing before the claim can move.
Whether the next action belongs with Soft Appeals, your organization, your billing partner or another party.
Hand the recommendations to your existing billing or revenue-cycle team and work them yourselves.
If you want recovery support, the eligible scope, responsibilities, pricing, approval process and engagement terms are established first.
Claims marked Investigate can move forward once the missing information is obtained.
The assessment stays yours. There is no obligation to continue.
Soft Appeals is not designed to work around your billing partner. If your billing company currently owns the denial workflow, you can involve the appropriate representative in the assessment and in any recovery work that follows.
Clear roles beat duplicate effort. A claim should have one visible next action and one accountable owner, and agreeing that up front is faster than discovering two people worked the same appeal.
You do not need to send an entire backlog to find out whether the service is useful. Begin with 20 recent denials. A larger backlog can be scoped after the initial review.
A sample of 20 is usually enough to establish:
Use the time-sensitive question in the intake form to flag that some claims may have approaching deadlines. Do not put patient information in the form to make the point. Soft Appeals can then decide the appropriate next intake step and whether the review can be responsibly accepted, based on the available information and current capacity.
An approaching deadline does not guarantee that a claim can be accepted, or that a complete submission can be prepared without the required information.
Tell us about your organization and your denial situation first. If Soft Appeals looks appropriate, the next intake step gets established before any claim-level information is exchanged. Already have security, compliance or contracting questions? Ask those before sending PHI, not after.